Modem Physics Enters The Void
The first observation
that we make the moment we set out to study the phenomenon
called “space” is that the adjective “empty” can never
accurately be applied to it. Since we have already found
that the energy fields we call “matter” are all
interconnected by other fields which we call “forces,” there
cannot be even the tiniest area of space anywhere in the
cosmos in which at least one of these field-types is not
present.
According to relativity theory, however, an energy field
does not just fill the area of space which contains it—the
field actually is the space itself. An energy field
determines the actual structure of the space it inhabits;
therefore, modern physics has abandoned all distinctions
between fields and space. The consequences of this discovery
become far-reaching indeed when we remember that matter is
nothing but a particular type of energy field, for this
means that matter and space must now be considered
inseparable and interdependent. Modern physics considers
matter and space to be two different aspects of a single
phenomenon. This explains why the closer we look at a material
particle; the more all distinctions between it and the space
around it become lost. It also accounts for the astounding
fact that such particles can be observed actually springing
into existence directly from the void, as well as vanishing
suddenly back into nothingness. What we are seeing are
simply two different sides of the same coin.
The reigning model of the universe upheld by physicists today is
that of quantum field theory, which effectively combines the
laws of classical physics with those of quantum theory and
relativity. This view of the cosmos erases all distinctions
between matter, energy and space, encompassing them all
within a single physical reality called the quantum
field. This field is present everywhere, and its most
distinctive characteristic is that there are two apparent
aspects to its basic nature: (1) it has a continuous
structure which we know as “space” and “time” because this
aspect seems to exist constantly and changelessly throughout
the cosmos and also throughout the past, present and future;
and (2) it also has a granular or particle aspect which we
know as “matter” and “force” because in this aspect the
quantum field appears in the form of discontinuous,
localized particles which enjoy only temporary existence.
The field continually oscillates between these two
apparently dissimilar states, incessantly transforming
itself from one to the other.
Now we can no longer consider space to be simply a static
background [or events or a passive container of objects, for
it does in tact possess a vital, self-governing structure of
its own, If we want to really understand the nature of a
subatomic particle, therefore, we must observe it in
connection with the space around it, instead of trying
to draw distinctions between the particle and that space.
Observed in this light, for example, an electron reveals itself to
be a kind of “energy knot,” a blemish on the face of its
underlying field; it does not in fact revolve around its
nucleus as does our earth around its sun; instead, it
propagates through space like a water wave, and clearly does
not consist of any selfsame substance at all times. A
material particle, it turns out, is simply a local
condensation of the quantum field, a temporary concentration
of energy which appears solid to our sight and touch. In the
words of Albert Einstein: “We may therefore regard matter as
being constituted by the regions of space in which the field
is extremely intense. . . . There is no place in this
kind of physics both for the field and matter, for the field
is the only reality.”3
The physical vacuum, as the void is called in quantum field theory,
is far from empty nothingness, for it contains an infinite
number of every type of particle in potential form, which
also indirectly means that it contains all material
objects in potential form as well. Every object in the
world around us is a transient particle manifestation of the
quantum field, and every interaction among these objects, as
well as between us and them, is also carried by this field
in the form of vibrational waves. If it were not for this
living, moving void, if it did not continually vibrate in an
endless dance of creation and destruction, there would be no
physical universe, no perceptible reality at all, anywhere.
The discovery that the physical vacuum or void is alive and
active is one of the outstanding revelations of modem
physics.
As yet, science does not know what the quantum field is made of,
but it is now considered the fundamental substance of all
material phenomena in Creation. It is not, however, viewed
as the basis of all nonmaterial phenomena, most notably the
force of gravity. Convinced that there must exist an even
more fundamental ground field which would prove to be the
basis of both the quantum and gravitational fields, Einstein
spent twenty years of his life in pursuit of such a unified
field theory. Finally, in 1949, he presented a mathematical
solution which brings these apparently diverse phenomena
under the same set of equations, but three decades later his
theory remains unverified, since no practicable way has yet
been found to confirm the results of his mathematics with
experimental evidence.
Nevertheless, in what is perhaps the most astounding
example of “East meets West,” today’s physicists have
completely verified the ancient Oriental assertion that the
material world is an illusion, and in addition have come
within a hair’s breadth of confirming another famous Eastern
postulate as well—the one proclaiming that ‘‘All is One.’’
Now that we have examined the world-view held by modern physicists,
the view put forth by yogic scientists may not seem as
bizarre as it once did to Westerners, for as we shall see,
the two views are strikingly similar. The major difference
between them, in fact, may be that most of us will likely
find the yogic model of reality, with its dramatic use of
metaphor, to be a great deal more comprehensible than the
abstract mathematical concepts presented by contemporary
physics. Let’s compare the two and decide for ourselves